Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to take leave and be paid until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with an unclear guarantee that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: job If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: job First thing we tell them is care. There are no warranties consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have severe effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t wish to return to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, job then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, job it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes because there are no assurances. And these are individuals who like their job. They like the mission of the firm. They work hard. And today, they’re facing really difficult choices, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to order agencies to offer this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is quite possibly setting the stage for challenges because I feel OPM has actually greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site regards to usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for further details.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not be in its last kind and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.